I wrote my comment with good intentions and didn't have to resort to personal attacks, unlike you. which doesn't contribute to the discussion, doesn't help you defend your point of view and makes you look like a fool. When presented with facts and objective statements proving your comments wrong, you commit a logical fallacy called "Special Pleading" ( Google it up) and write stuff like: The points you've made have been refuted many times, both in this thread and other resources I provided. Your "opinion" comes across as a statement of facts. For poor aiming in general Stoner works better than other options (high rate of fire and more bullets in the belt allow to land bodyshots quickly).
#Killing floor 2 stoner Ps4#
Well, I don't have a PS4 (nor do I have a controller) so I can't make any conclusions on how poor aiming is with this setup. If you're interested in objective reasoning on why Stoner is subpar compared to other options (and why it's not as good as it seems to be for extending Zed Time) check out this thread, this comment and this guide (section "Bad Weapons - Stoner 63A LMG").Īnd what about poor aiming? I'm playing with a controller on a PS4. You can have fun with both less and more optimal options. Just take the weapon which is the most fun for youįun is subjective. It's lame to only playing with the strongest weapons imo.Īren't you contradicting yourself here? What is the primary scope of your argumentation: objective facts or subjective means of having fun?
Just take the weapon which is the most fun for you. What is better and which weapons are the best.and make the most damage. If you have to kill many many trash zeds (All between Crawler and Gorefiends) and want to extend Zed-Time to the maximum, you should take the Stoner with you!
0 kommentar(er)
